Top 7 Quickbase Alternatives & Competitors in 2025

Let’s check out each one in turn.

1. Budibase

Budibase empowers busy IT teams to turn data into action. Our open-source, low-code platform is designed for technical users who need to ship professional internal tools at pace with a diverse range of data sources.

With expansive connectivity, intuitive design tools, powerful automations, and extensive flexibility, Budibase is the fast, easy way to build all kinds of workflow tools.

Features

Budibase is a clear leader for external data support. Alongside our internal database, we offer dedicated connectors for a huge range of SQL and NoSQL DBMSs, as well as Google Sheets and REST APIs. You can even use our dedicated CLI to build custom data sources. Quickly create granular views based on your data, assign them to user roles, and autogenerate secure UIs in just a few clicks.

Our drag-and-drop UI builder offers a wide range of configurable components for displaying and managing connected data. We even offer auto-generated CRUD UIs, flexible forms, in-line table editing, custom conditionality rules, front-end JavaScript, and more.

Budibase also makes automating manual tasks quick and easy. Combine and configure our built-in actions, looping, and branching logic to build custom rules, triggered using in-app actions, database events, incoming WebHooks, or chron expressions.

We’re proud to have one of the most generous offerings in terms of enterprise functionality in the low-code space. Budibase is fully self-hostable and offers free SSO alongside highly scalable per-user pricing. We even offer connectivity for a range of LLMs with our custom AI configs.

Use-cases

At Budibase, our goal is to empower IT teams to provide their colleagues with high-quality solutions, without expending excessive development resources.

Internal development teams simply don’t have the capacity to keep pace with the demand for custom internal tooling.

Solutions architects, product managers, data specialists, and other technical professionals choose Budibase to build professional tools - with custom code being totally optional.

Budibase is the ideal solution for building all sorts of workflow and data management apps, including portals, admin panels, forms, approval tools, dashboards, CRUD applications, and more.

Pricing

Budibase bills on a per-user basis, distinguishing between the colleagues who build apps and their end-users. With our free tier, you can build as many apps as you want for up to five users in the cloud or 20 users if you self-host.

Uniquely, our free plan comes with SSO.

Premium licenses bill at $50 per creator per month, and $5 per end-user. This also comes along with custom branding, synchronous automations, and application back-ups.

We also offer custom enterprise pricing, with enforceable SSO, audit logs, active directory support, air-gapped deployment, and more.

2. Airtable

Airtable is one of the most ubiquitous players in this space. The core value here is combining the intuitive, familiar UX of a spreadsheet tool - with the power and capabilities of a traditional DBMS.

On top of this, it offers useful capabilities around building interfaces, automating processes, and handling different users’ permissions and data exposure.

Pros

Airtable’s big selling point is how easy it is to create advanced data management solutions, without requiring extensive technical skills or expertise. Instead, you can interact with your data in much the same way you would in Excel or Google Sheets.

However, Airtable is somewhat more advanced than most other low-code database solutions. It’s a particularly strong offering for enabling non-developers to build custom apps. It offers a built-in interface designer, largely focused on data tables, forms, and reports.

Airtable also offers a range of tools that make it easy to get up and running with the platform. There’s an impressive library of existing app templates that provide a helpful way to get started with key use cases.

Cons

Airtable’s focus is enabling teams to switch from spreadsheets to a more advanced database, often for the first time. On the flip side, it’s comparatively limited in terms of support for external databases, instead focusing on SaaS tools and APIs.

So, if we want to connect to an existing database, we’ll have to rely on API requests or intermediary tools. We can’t simply write SQL queries within Airtable and use the responses to populate our app front-ends.

Airtable also can’t be self-hosted. This is a firm requirement for many businesses when it comes to managing key data assets. So, if this is important for your organization, you’ll need to look elsewhere.

Pricing

Airtable is billed on a per-user basis - but each plan also imposes limitations in terms of automation runs and stored data rows. The Free tier offers unlimited bases of up to 1,000 rows each, for up to five users.

The Team and Business tiers bill at $20 and $45 per user per month respectively. Unfortunately, there’s no distinction between creators/administrators and end-users, which means Airtable has the potential to get pricey for larger user volumes.

You’ll need to opt for custom enterprise pricing if you’re stored data exceeds 500,000 rows per base, to make more than 500,000 automation runs in a month, or to access premium security features.

3. AppSheet

AppSheet is Google’s no-code solution. Whereas Quickbase or Airtable try to move teams away from reliance on spreadsheets, AppSheet is largely focused on giving existing spreadsheet users tools to interact more effectively with their data.

Essentially, the goal is to enable non-technical colleagues to build simple applications on top of Google Sheets - as well as data stored in external SaaS platforms.

Pros

AppSheet is a no-code platform. So, it makes it incredibly easy to build simple interfaces without the need to write a single line of code. If you’ve used Google Forms, this will be quite a familiar experience, but with somewhat greater capabilities.

It’s particularly effective for building simple interfaces like data entry forms, dashboards, approval tools, or CRUD apps.

We can also add basic business logic using expressions that resemble typical spreadsheet formulae. This is helpful, as it introduces a certain amount of flexibility without increasing the required technical skills much.

Cons

The big issue with AppSheet, however, is that it’s very restrictive in terms of what’s actually possible. With no space to add custom code, AppSheet is really only suitable for the most basic of use cases.

It’s also somewhat limited in terms of additional features - with no self-hosting or ability to build custom data sources and components.

AppSheet is also heavily embedded in Google’s wider WorkSpace ecosystem. As such, experiences for connecting to Google Sheets or other native data sources are very streamlined, but accessing other data is somewhat trickier - though not impossible.

Pricing

AppSheet’s free tier offers testing capabilities for up to 10 users. To share production apps with your wider team, you’ll need to opt for one of their paid plans - which start from $5 per user per month.

At $10 per month, the Core tier offers additional automation and security features on top of this.

However, AppSheet requires custom pricing to access key functionality like support for external databases and APIs. So, it could be an expensive option for more advanced solutions.

4. Appian

Appian is another platform that’s largely aimed at enabling non-technical business users to output custom tools for interacting with internal data - especially within enterprises and other large organizations.

However, perhaps out of all of the platforms we’ve seen today, it puts the heaviest focus on process management.

Pros

Appian is one of our strongest Quickbooks alternatives when it comes to automation. It offers a range of powerful tools around AI, RPA, process mining, orchestrations, and performance analytics - all centered around an intuitive flowchart-based automation builder.

More than some other platforms we’ve seen today, Appian is a viable tool for managing existing external data. It offers connectors for a range of SQL databases - although NoSQL support is somewhat lacking.

In terms of design, it offers more flexibility than AppSheet or Airtable, since we have the flexibility to add custom code.

Cons

However, Appian falls behind Budibase or Retool for design experiences. The UI builder itself feels a little bit more dated, and offers slightly less flexibility around the kinds of interfaces we can design.

While a self-hosted version of Appian is available, some users complain that it fails to keep pace with the cloud offering in terms of rolling out new features. This could be a source of frustration in situations where self-hosting is a firm requirement.

Other users have reported performance issues when handling larger volumes of data. The diagrammatic approach to building automations can also be somewhat unwieldy for more complex, iterative rules.

Pricing

Appian has the potential to be fairly affordable, but their pricing model is also quite complex so this is hard to predict. With a free license, you can build as many cloud apps as you want for up to 15 users.

You can self-host with the Application tier or above. This charges on a monthly per-user basis - distinguishing between Standard ($75), Infrequent ($9), and Input-Only ($2) users. So, this could be very cost-effective if your users will only interact with your apps occasionally.

Custom pricing is available on a per-app or per-development basis.

5. Zoho Creator

Creator is Zoho’s low-code platform. It takes a slightly different approach to some of the other platforms we’ve seen, aiming squarely at the citizen development market.

The idea is to enable IT teams to allow their business-level colleagues to build solutions for their own needs in a controlled manner, without undermining existing governance processes.

Pros

Compared to Quickbase, Zoho Creator is very strong on support for external data - especially around SaaS platforms. We can easily connect to a range of CRMs, workload management tools, marketing platforms, and more.

Creator also shines on governance. You can combine its built-in RBAC with custom security policies to create highly granular controls around how specific users can interact with different data assets.

For users with slightly more coding skills, Creator offers front-end scripting with JavaScript. This introduces a huge amount of additional flexibility and scope for customization compared to some of the other Quickbase alternatives we’ve seen.

Cons

Compared to Quickbase, Zoho Creator presents considerably higher technical barriers to building tools. So, you’ll need to have some existing JavaScript abilities in order to get the most out of the platform.

Since the platform is optimized for collaboration between IT teams and business-level users - experiences may not be entirely satisfactory for either persona acting in isolation. So, it may be too inflexible for IT teams but too technical for other colleagues.

Self-hosted instances of Zoho Creator also lack the full complement of features available to cloud users, which will be frustrating for many potential users.

Pricing

Zoho offers three user-based pricing tiers for Creator - Standard ($8), Professional ($20), and Enterprise ($25). Standard licenses are limited to a single application.

There are also other usage-based limits across each of the tiers. These include restrictions on automation runs and connected data. So, we might quickly need to upgrade to a more expensive option for advanced, data-heavy use cases.

Some enterprise features like SSO are available on all tiers but billed as an optional extra for Standard and Professional licenses.

6. Filemaker

Claris Filemaker is Apple’s low-code offering. It entered the market in the 1980s as an alternative to Microsoft Access . As such, it’s primarily based around a visual editor for creating database schemas - with additional tools for building UIs and automations.

It’s positioned primarily at situations where spreadsheets are no longer a viable option for managing data, but teams don’t want to move to a traditional RDBMS.

Pros

A huge part of Filemaker’s popularity is the ease with which we can create functional, custom databases. In fact, we can create relatively sophisticated relational data models without needing to write custom queries.

We can easily create data management interfaces like forms and CRUD apps - or draw insights from our data in reports and dashboards.

Filemaker also offers some unique capabilities around shipping PWAs and native mobile apps. It even offers direct integration with Apple’s iOS SDK, making it incredibly easy to ship working apps to the App Store.

Cons

However, there are also some key downsides to Filemaker compared to other Quickbase alternatives. One is that its UI feels relatively dated, especially alongside some of its more modern competitors.

Filemaker is intended to be a sticky platform. So, some users complain that if they eventually need to migrate their workflows to a more sophisticated custom solution, porting their data can be slightly tricky.

While the integration options are generally quite strong, Filemaker lacks dedicated connectors for querying NoSQL tools, which many other platforms in this space provide.

Pricing

Filemaker is one of the less affordable options in this space. To begin with, there’s no free trial - although uniquely lifetime single-user licenses are available for the local Windows and MacOS packages.

But to compare with other platforms, we’re mainly interested in the cloud offering. This bills at $21 per user per month for 5-10 users and up to three apps or $43 for 10-99 users with up to 125 apps.

There are also usage limits covering stored data, API requests, and computing resources. Therefore, Filemaker has the potential to be a particularly expensive option, especially as you scale out your usage.

7. SmartSheet

Much like Airtable, SmartSheet is a Quickbase competitor that seeks to combine the power and flexibility of a traditional database with a user experience that will be familiar to spreadsheet users.

However, like Quickbase, it’s primarily aimed at quite a narrow range of use cases, including managing tasks, projects, workloads, and internal resources.

Pros

One of SmartSheet’s real strengths is its range of native integration options, particularly with external SaaS, marketing, finance, CRM, ERP, and other key business platforms. It’s a very effective solution for non-technical colleagues to centralize disparate internal data.

It’s easy to create custom views for interacting with our data - including calendars, Gantt charts, Kanban boards, and more. However, as you’ll notice, these skew heavily toward project management use cases.

We can also build more custom UIs using the SmartSheet WorkApps platform. This is a relatively effective no-code tool for building simple apps like forms and calculators to be used within project workflows.

Cons

One obvious potential drawback to SmartSheet is that it’s optimized for a relatively tight range of use cases. This could be ideal if you’re specifically looking to create solutions around relevant use cases - but it might not be much use outside of this.

It also offers comparatively little customization relative to some of the more technical platforms we’ve seen - although this is always a trade-off when it comes to enabling non-technical colleagues to output solutions.

Interestingly, SmartSheet can be connected to external databases but only offers scheduled syncs rather than direct querying - so this might only be viable in certain circumstances with low-volume database transactions.

Pricing

SmartSheet positions itself towards the more affordable end of the market. There are four monthly per-user tiers - Free, Pro ($7), Business ($25), and Enterprise (Custom). However, we’ll need the Business tier if we have more than 10 users.

However, there are usage-based limitations in terms of automation runs and stored data - as well as restricted features across the pricing tiers. So, although it’s quite an affordable option, the cost of scaling could vary quite a bit.

SmartSheet also offers basic SSO across all of its pricing tiers, which is relatively generous compared to some competitors.

Quickbase vs Budibase

Now that we’ve seen a range of Quickbase alternatives from different corners of the market, we can dive a little bit deeper into how it stacks up against Budibase.

Again, each platform takes a distinct approach to enabling teams to craft more effective solutions for interacting with internal data.

Here’s a summary of how this breaks down.

Data connectivity

Quickbase is primarily focused on unifying data that would otherwise be handled with spreadsheets or within SaaS platforms. And, it’s a strong offering in this regard.

It’s also possible to connect to external databases. However, this requires us to set up API or ODBC configurations. This isn’t exactly a streamlined experience - particularly for non-developers.

By contrast, Budibase offers highly intuitive experiences for connecting your applications to all kinds of existing data sources.

We offer dedicated connector UIs for MySQL, MSSQL, Postgres, S3, Airtable, Couch, Mongo, Oracle, REST APIs, Google Sheets, and many more. We’ve also got our own built-in low-code database with full support for CSV uploads.

UI design

The Quickbase UI builder is effective for building simple applications, including forms and reports. But, it lacks some of the sophistication and configurability that we’ve seen from some of the other low-code platforms in this round-up.

On the one hand, there’s no real scope for front-end scripting. On the other, it also lacks native functionality for creating more complex user experiences.

Budibase empowers non-developers to build beautiful, highly advanced app screens - with the option to add custom code when they need to.

Use custom JavaScript or our huge library of built-in handlebars helpers to bind UI elements to external data. We also offer scope for custom CSS, conditionality rules, multi-step forms, autogenerated CRUD screens, and more.

Extensibility

Quickbase offers an impressive range of integration options for most common SaaS and back office tools. It’s also possible to set up custom data pipelines using ODBC, Webhooks, or API requests.

There’s huge potential here for creating highly streamlined data ops around the platform. However, there’s comparatively little scope for extending functionality, UI elements, or connectivity.

Quickbase also offers plug-ins, but these are limited to a small number of native expansions.

Budibase is the clear leader for extensibility. On top of extensive database and API connectivity, we offer custom data sources and components via our dedicated CLI tools. You power Budibase AI features with the LLM of your choice using our custom AI configs.

Or, you can use our API to manage and interact with your apps from external tools.

Deployment, usage, and administration

Quickbase is fully cloud-based, although it can connect to on-prem data sources if you opt for enterprise pricing.

Budibase offers self-hosting at all price points, alongside our cloud-based platform. Deploy to your own infrastructure using Kubernetes, Docker, Digital Ocean, Portainer, Podman, and more.

We also have a much more generous offering for user management and administration features. For example, we offer free SSO across the board, whereas this requires a Business license in Quickbase, billing at $55 per user per month.

How to choose a Quickbase alternative

Lastly, it’s important to be cognizant that all of the platforms we’ve seen today target distinct user personas and market segments.

So, inevitably, the right solution is going to vary from one business to the next.

Therefore, we need a clear framework for assessing different platforms against our requirements.

Here are some of the key decision points you’ll want to consider.

Pricing

The first thing we need to contend with is pricing. Naturally, when we adopt any new platform, we want to ensure that we achieve a return on investment. However, given the different pricing structures we’ve seen, it can often be difficult to compare like with like.

Most tools in this space bill on a per-user basis, but the more granular breakdown of features and other restrictions across individual tiers varies widely.

So, a per-user estimate might be misleading because we might still need a particular piece of functionality that’s restricted to a higher price point.

Despite this, having an illustrative idea of how different user volumes will incur costs for each platform is helpful.

Here’s how this might break down, assuming each of our users access our tools at least once per week.

Scale

The scale of our needs - along with how we expect this to change over time - also plays an enormous role in any purchasing decision.

In the specific case of Quickbase alternatives, we need to think about this from a few separate angles.

User volumes are the most obvious - and we’ve already covered this extensively. The key thing to remember is that some vendors have maximum user numbers at different pricing tiers, so we need to account for this in our planning.

There are also other usage-based restrictions at various pricing tiers for different platforms - potentially relating to elements like our stored data, automation runs, or even how often each user interacts with the platform.

Lastly, we have feature restrictions. So if we have a firm requirement for a piece of functionality that’s restricted to a particular pricing tier, we’ll need to opt for this - even if it doesn’t match up with the vendor’s stated user-based pricing.

Open-source vs closed-source

Open-source software is a big priority for a lot of larger organizations. Transparency and auditability are crucial when it comes to any software platform that could be interacting with production data or other mission-critical assets and processes.

For these companies, additional assurances, policies, or other measures may be required to adopt closed-source tools, potentially slowing down procurement processes.

Here’s a breakdown of the tools we’ve seen today.

Existing data ops

Each of the platforms we’ve seen today also targets very different organizations in terms of their existing data operations.

Almost every business in the world stands to benefit from improving the way their users interact with data assets.

However, there is a big difference between platforms that seek to replace spreadsheets and unify SaaS data - and those that are intended for building applications on top of more advanced database management systems.

Here’s a breakdown of the data connectivity offered by each of our Quickbase alternatives.

Creator personas

Lastly, each vendor targets a subtly different kind of end user in terms of who is going to be building solutions on top of data assets.

Within the no/low-code space, there’s a spectrum of target user personas. At one end, there are tools aimed at non-technical users and at the other, there are full-blown developer tools.

In between, there’s a wide range of tools that variously target citizen developers, IT professionals, departmental leaders, business technologists, and other more granular personas.

Here’s one way that we can break down the market: